“We have the financial strength to meet the challenges of a volatile
crude price environment and significant efforts are underway to manage
to a lower cost structure and capital spend rate,” said
The company informed stockholders on its commitment to safety, noting that 2014 was Chevron’s best year on every key measure of personal safety, process safety and environmental performance.
Stockholders voted on 13 items. As reported during the meeting, the preliminary report of the Inspector of Elections was as follows:
- Item 1: An average of 98 percent of the votes cast were voted for each of the 12 nominees for election to the board of directors.
-
Item 2: Approximately 99 percent of the votes cast were voted to
ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the company. - Item 3: Approximately 94 percent of the votes cast were voted to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation for the company’s named executive officers.
-
Item 4: Approximately 95 percent of the votes cast were voted against
the stockholder proposal to disclose charitable contributions of
$5,000 or more. - Item 5: Approximately 72 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal regarding a report on lobbying.
- Item 6: Approximately 96 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal to cease using corporate funds for political purposes.
- Item 7: Approximately 96 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal to adopt a dividend policy.
- Item 8: Approximately 91 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal regarding targets reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
- Item 9: Approximately 73 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal regarding a report on shale energy operations.
- Item 10: Approximately 55 percent of the votes cast were voted for the stockholder proposal regarding proxy access.
- Item 11: Approximately 78 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal to adopt a policy for an independent chairman.
- Item 12: Approximately 80 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal to recommend an independent director with environmental expertise.
- Item 13: Approximately 69 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal to set meetings threshold at 10 percent.
“The board will consider the final voting results carefully, including the vote on proxy access and the thoughtful stockholder discussions on that issue,” Watson stated.
Final voting results will be reported on a Form 8-K, which will be filed
with the
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS RELEVANT TO FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This press release contains forward-looking statements relating to
Chevron’s operations that are based on management’s current
expectations, estimates and projections about the petroleum, chemicals
and other energy-related industries. Words or phrases such as
“anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “forecasts,”
“projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “schedules,” “estimates,” ”may,”
”could,” “budgets,” “outlook,” ”on schedule,” “on track” and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which
are beyond the company’s control and are difficult to predict.
Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what
is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. The
reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release.
Unless legally required,
Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements are: changing
crude oil and natural gas prices; changing refining, marketing and
chemicals margins; actions of competitors or regulators; timing of
exploration expenses; timing of crude oil liftings; the competitiveness
of alternate-energy sources or product substitutes; technological
developments; the results of operations and financial condition of
equity affiliates; the inability or failure of the company’s
joint-venture partners to fund their share of operations and development
activities; the potential failure to achieve expected net production
from existing and future crude oil and natural gas development projects;
potential delays in the development, construction or start-up of planned
projects; the potential disruption or interruption of the company’s
production or manufacturing facilities or delivery/transportation
networks due to war, accidents, political events, civil unrest, severe
weather, other natural or human factors, or crude oil production quotas
that might be imposed by the
View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150527005952/en/
Source:
Chevron Corporation
Melissa Ritchie, 925-790-3372