“2016 was a transition year for
Watson reiterated that he is confident about the company’s future. “We
are well positioned with a strong portfolio and the right business
model, including a profitable downstream and chemical business and an
upstream portfolio of shorter cycle opportunities, highlighted by our
enviable position in the
Stockholders voted on 10 items. As reported during the meeting, the preliminary report of the Inspector of Elections was as follows:
- Item 1: An average of 97 percent of the votes cast were voted for each of the 12 nominees for election to the board of directors.
-
Item 2: Approximately 98 percent of the votes cast were voted to
ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the company. - Item 3: Approximately 93 percent of the votes cast were voted to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers.
- Item 4: Approximately 88 percent of the votes cast were voted, on an advisory basis, in favor of an annual advisory vote on named executive officer compensation.
- Item 5: Approximately 71 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal regarding a report on lobbying.
- Item 6: Approximately 94 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal regarding a report on business with conflict-complicit governments.
- Item 7: Withdrawn
- Item 8: Approximately 73 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal regarding a report on transition to a low carbon economy.
- Item 9: Approximately 61 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal to require an independent chairman.
- Item 10: Approximately 80 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal to recommend an independent director with environmental expertise.
- Item 11: Approximately 69 percent of the votes cast were voted against the stockholder proposal to set the special meetings threshold at 10 percent.
Final voting results will be reported on a Form 8-K, which will be filed
with the
NOTICE
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS RELEVANT TO FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This press release contains forward-looking statements relating to
Chevron’s operations that are based on management’s current
expectations, estimates and projections about the petroleum, chemicals
and other energy-related industries. Words or phrases such as
“anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “forecasts,”
“projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “schedules,” “estimates,” “positions,”
“pursues,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “budgets,” “outlook,” “focus,” “on
schedule,” “on track,” “goals,” “objectives,” “strategies” and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which
are beyond the company’s control and are difficult to predict.
Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what
is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. The
reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release.
Unless legally required,
Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements are: changing
crude oil and natural gas prices; changing refining, marketing and
chemicals margins; the company's ability to realize anticipated cost
savings and expenditure reductions; actions of competitors or
regulators; timing of exploration expenses; timing of crude oil
liftings; the competitiveness of alternate-energy sources or product
substitutes; technological developments; the results of operations and
financial condition of the company's suppliers, vendors, partners and
equity affiliates, particularly during extended periods of low prices
for crude oil and natural gas; the inability or failure of the company’s
joint-venture partners to fund their share of operations and development
activities; the potential failure to achieve expected net production
from existing and future crude oil and natural gas development projects;
potential delays in the development, construction or start-up of planned
projects; the potential disruption or interruption of the company’s
operations due to war, accidents, political events, civil unrest, severe
weather, cyber threats and terrorist acts, crude oil production quotas
or other actions that might be imposed by the
View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170531005486/en/
Source:
Chevron Corporation
Melissa Ritchie
mritchie@chevron.com