e8vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 8-K
Current Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 10, 2007
Chevron Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
1-368-2
|
|
94-0890210 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation )
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer No.) |
|
|
|
6001 Bollinger Canyon Road, San Ramon, CA
|
|
94583 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (925) 842-1000
|
|
|
None
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report) |
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligations of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
On July 10, 2007, Chevron Corporation issued a press release providing a second quarter 2007
interim update. The press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by
reference.
The information included herein and in Exhibit 99.1 shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference
in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Dated: July 10, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHEVRON CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ M.A. Humphrey
|
|
|
|
M. A. Humphrey, Vice President and |
|
|
|
Comptroller
(Principal Accounting Officer and
Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
99.1 Press release issued July 10, 2007.
exv99w1
Exhibit 99.1
Chevron Corporation
Policy, Government and Public Affairs
Post Office Box 6078
San Ramon, CA 94583-0778
www.chevron.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CHEVRON ISSUES INTERIM UPDATE FOR SECOND QUARTER 2007
SAN RAMON, Calif., July 10, 2007 Chevron Corporation (NYSE:CVX) today issued its interim
update for the second quarter of 2007. The company expects second quarter results to benefit from
higher commodity prices in Upstream, stronger refining margins in Downstream and a gain on the sale
of its interest in Dynegy, partially offset by net charges related to the redemption of debt and
other corporate items.
The interim update contains certain industry and company operating data for the second
quarter. The production volumes, realizations, margins, and other identified items in the report
are based on a portion of the quarter and are not necessarily indicative of Chevrons quarterly
results to be reported on July 27, 2007. The reader should not place undue reliance on this data.
Unless noted otherwise, all commentary is based on two months of the second quarter
2007 vs. full first quarter 2007 results.
UPSTREAM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION
The table that follows includes information on production and price indicators for crude oil
and natural gas for specific markets. Actual realizations may vary from indicative pricing due to
quality and location differentials and the effect of pricing lags. International results are driven
by actual liftings, which may differ from production due to the timing of cargoes and other
factors.
-MORE-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q |
|
|
3Q |
|
|
4Q |
|
|
1Q |
|
|
2Q thru May |
|
|
2Q thru Jun |
|
U.S. Upstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquids |
|
|
|
|
|
MBD |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
MMCFD |
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
BOE |
|
|
|
|
|
MBOED |
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. WTI Spot Price |
|
|
|
|
|
$/Bbl |
|
|
70.57 |
|
|
|
70.56 |
|
|
|
59.98 |
|
|
|
58.09 |
|
|
|
63.70 |
|
|
|
64.96 |
|
Avg. Midway Sunset Posted Price |
|
|
|
|
|
$/Bbl |
|
|
58.71 |
|
|
|
59.08 |
|
|
|
48.20 |
|
|
|
47.08 |
|
|
|
53.78 |
|
|
|
55.18 |
|
Nat. Gas-Henry Hub. Bid Week Avg. |
|
|
|
|
|
$/MCF |
|
|
6.81 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
6.80 |
|
|
|
7.54 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
|
Nat. Gas-CA Border Bid Week Avg. |
|
|
|
|
|
$/MCF |
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
|
6.66 |
|
|
|
6.68 |
|
|
|
6.85 |
|
Nat. Gas-Rocky Mountain Bid Week Avg. |
|
|
|
|
|
$/MCF |
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Realizations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude |
|
|
|
|
|
$/Bbl |
|
|
62.30 |
|
|
|
63.98 |
|
|
|
52.98 |
|
|
|
51.60 |
|
|
|
57.62 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Liquids |
|
|
|
|
|
$/Bbl |
|
|
60.07 |
|
|
|
61.99 |
|
|
|
51.06 |
|
|
|
49.91 |
|
|
|
56.07 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
$/MCF |
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
$MM, B/T |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Upstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquids |
|
|
|
|
|
MBD |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Other Produced Volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
MBD |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
MBD |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
MMCFD |
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
|
3,067 |
|
|
|
3,271 |
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
BOE incl. Other Produced Volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
MBOED |
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. Brent Spot Price |
|
|
|
|
|
$/Bbl |
|
|
69.39 |
|
|
|
69.72 |
|
|
|
59.44 |
|
|
|
58.26 |
|
|
|
67.54 |
|
|
|
68.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Realizations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquids |
|
|
|
|
|
$/Bbl |
|
|
62.24 |
|
|
|
61.90 |
|
|
|
51.77 |
|
|
|
51.15 |
|
|
|
59.92 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
$/MCF |
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
$MM, B/T |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
U.S. oil-equivalent production increased 1 percent from the first quarter, as volumes restored
from downtime associated with third-party pipeline disruptions were partially offset by a
combination of scheduled maintenance and other downtime in the Gulf of Mexico, which continued in
June. International oil-equivalent production also rose slightly from the first quarter.
U.S. crude realizations improved by $6.02 per barrel in line with the increase in WTI and
California heavy crude prices. International liquids realizations increased $8.77 per barrel,
consistent with the increase in Brent spot prices. In June, benchmark pricing continued to rise
worldwide.
U.S. natural gas realizations increased $0.16 per thousand cubic feet, while bid week pricing
was mixed, with Henry Hub increasing and Rocky Mountain decreasing.
International Upstream results are expected to include charges of approximately $100 million
for write-offs associated with exploratory wells and other assets.
DOWNSTREAM REFINING, MARKETING AND TRANSPORATION
The table that follows includes industry benchmark indicators for refining and marketing
margins. Actual margins realized by the company may differ significantly due to location and
product mix effects, planned and unplanned shutdown activity and other company-specific and
operational factors.
-2-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q |
|
|
3Q |
|
|
4Q |
|
|
1Q |
|
|
2Q thru May |
|
|
2Q thru Jun |
|
Downstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Indicators |
|
$/Bbl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining Margins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USWC ANS 5-3-1-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.06 |
|
|
|
19.36 |
|
|
|
20.55 |
|
|
|
26.69 |
|
|
|
33.30 |
|
|
|
30.28 |
|
USGC LHD Avg of Mogas + Dist, less Fuel Oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.04 |
|
|
|
34.10 |
|
|
|
27.58 |
|
|
|
28.85 |
|
|
|
38.24 |
|
|
|
37.17 |
|
Singapore Dubai 3-1-1-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.77 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
1.96 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
9.19 |
|
|
|
8.87 |
|
N.W. Europe Brent 3-1-1-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
(0.22) |
|
|
|
(2.06) |
|
|
|
(0.53) |
|
|
|
2.97 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Margins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. West LA Mogas DTW to Spot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
11.08 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
U.S. East Houston Mogas Rack to Spot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
|
7.31 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
|
Asia-Pacific / Middle East / Africa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
7.31 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Latin America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.28 |
|
|
|
5.92 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
|
|
|
7.22 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Volumes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Refinery Input |
|
MBD |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Intl Refinery Input |
|
MBD |
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
U.S. Branded Mogas Sales |
|
MBD |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
U.S. refinery crude-input volumes increased about 30 percent on completion of the first
quarters turnaround at the companys Richmond, California, refinery. In June, an extensive
planned turnaround of a crude distillation unit at the companys El Segundo, California refinery
was initiated. The unit was out-of-service for the entire month of June and work continues into
the third quarter. Due to inventory on hand, product supplies to customers were uninterrupted
during the maintenance outage. Outside the United States, refinery input volumes declined, largely
on the sale of the Nerefco Refinery at the end of the first quarter and a planned turnaround at the
Yeosu Refinery in South Korea.
The U.S. West Coast industry refining indicator improved by about $3.60 per barrel during the
three months of the second quarter; however, the company did not fully benefit from the increase
because of the downtime at the El Segundo Refinery that began in June. The U.S. Gulf Coast
light-heavy-differential marker averaged about $8.30 per barrel higher in the full second quarter.
Outside the United States, benchmark refining margins were also higher. However, for the first two
months of the quarter, actual refining margins realized were lower than indicator margins.
During the full second quarter, the Los Angeles mogas marketing margin indicator improved by
about $2.50 per barrel, while the Houston mogas indicator declined by about $1.20 per barrel. For
the first two months of the quarter, actual marketing margins realized in the United States were
lower than indicator margins reflecting different product and location mix effects. Outside the
United States, indicative marketing margins were mixed.
Downstream results for the second quarter will include charges for environmental remediation
items in excess of $50 million.
In May, the company announced an agreement to sell its Benelux marketing assets in Europe. A
gain on the sale is expected to be recorded at the time of close in the third quarter.
-3-
CHEMICALS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q |
|
|
3Q |
|
|
4Q |
|
|
1Q |
|
|
2Q thru May |
|
|
2Q thru Jun |
|
Chemicals Source: CMAI |
|
Cents/lb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethylene Industry Cash Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
17.02 |
|
|
|
16.12 |
|
|
|
11.10 |
|
|
|
10.79 |
|
|
|
11.21 |
|
HDPE Industry Contract Sales Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.28 |
|
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
12.10 |
|
|
|
13.62 |
|
|
|
14.69 |
|
|
|
14.45 |
|
Styrene Industry Contract Sales Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.73 |
|
|
|
11.24 |
|
|
|
11.51 |
|
|
|
11.09 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
|
|
11.13 |
|
Footnote
|
|
Prices, economics and views expressed by CMAI are strictly the
opinion of CMAI and Purvin & Gertz and are based on information
collected within the public sector and on assessments by CMAI and
Purvin & Gertz staff utilizing reasonable care consistent with
normal industry practice. CMAI and Purvin & Gertz make no guarantee
or warranty and assume no liability as to their use. |
In the Chemicals segment, full quarter industry indicator margins were slightly higher
relative to the first quarter.
ALL OTHER
The companys standard guidance for quarterly net after-tax charges related to corporate and
other activities, excluding Dynegy-related effects, is between $160 million and $200 million. Due
to the potential for irregularly occurring accruals related to tax items, pension settlements, and
other corporate items, actual results may differ.
Irregularly occurring items in the second quarter include a gain of approximately $680 million
on the sale of the companys investment in Dynegy and charges of about $160 million related to the
redemption of the outstanding Texaco Capital Bonds. Charges associated with environmental
remediation and other corporate items are also expected to be included in second quarter results.
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2Q |
|
|
3Q |
|
|
4Q |
|
|
1Q |
|
|
2Q thru May |
|
|
2Q thru Jun |
|
Other Items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange effects |
|
$MM, A/T |
|
|
(56) |
|
|
|
(111) |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(120) |
|
|
|
(95) |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Foreign exchange effects for the first two months of the second quarter reduced earnings by
$95 million, reflecting a weakening of the U.S. dollar that continued in June. Foreign exchange
effects are reported in the segment results.
Cautionary Statement Relevant To Forward-Looking Information For The Purpose Of Safe Harbor
Provisions Of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Of 1995
This Interim Update contains forward-looking statements relating to Chevrons operations that are
based on managements current expectations, estimates and projections about the petroleum,
chemicals and other energy-related industries. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends,
plans, targets, projects, believes, seeks, schedules, estimates, budgets and
similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are
not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other
factors, some of which are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual
outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such
forward-looking statements. The reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Interim Update. Unless legally required, Chevron undertakes no obligation to update publicly any
forward-looking statements,
-4-
whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements are crude oil and natural gas prices; refining margins and marketing
margins; chemicals prices and competitive conditions affecting supply and demand for aromatics,
olefins and additives products; actions of competitors; timing of exploration expenses; the
competitiveness of alternate energy sources or product substitutes; technological developments; the
results of operations and financial condition of equity affiliates; the inability or failure of the
companys joint-venture partners to fund their share of operations and development activities; the
potential failure to achieve expected net production from existing and future crude oil and natural
gas development projects; potential delays in the development, construction or start-up of planned
projects; the potential disruption or interruption of the companys net production or manufacturing
facilities or delivery/transportation networks due to war, accidents, political events, civil
unrest, severe weather or crude-oil production quotas that might be imposed by OPEC (Organization
of Petroleum Exporting Countries); the potential liability for remedial actions under existing or
future environmental regulations and litigation; significant investment or product changes under
existing or future environmental statutes, regulations and litigation; the potential liability
resulting from pending or future litigation; the companys acquisition or disposition of assets;
gains and losses from asset dispositions or impairments; government-mandated sales, divestitures,
recapitalizations, changes in fiscal terms or restrictions on scope of company operations; foreign
currency movements compared with the U.S. dollar; the effects of changed accounting rules under
generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by rule-setting bodies; and the factors set
forth under the heading Risk Factors on pages 31 and 32 of the companys 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. In addition, such statements could be affected by general domestic and international
economic and political conditions. Unpredictable or unknown factors not discussed in this report
could also have material adverse effects on forward-looking statements.
-5-